The majority of Lebanese have an unmet goal for ideal cardiovascular health contributing to increasing their cardiovascular risk age
Brief Report

The majority of Lebanese have an unmet goal for ideal cardiovascular health contributing to increasing their cardiovascular risk age

Hussain Isma’eel1*, Ayman Hakim1*, George Sakr2, Aurelie Mailhac1, Lara Nasreddine1, Hani Tamim1

1American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; 2St. Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

*These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence to: Hani Tamim, PhD. American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. Email: htamim@aub.edu.lb.

Abstract: The last European Society of Cardiology Guidelines highlighted that cardiovascular risk age (CRA) can be used in any population regardless of baseline risk and secular changes in mortality. This relieves the user from the need for recalibration. CRA also has the advantage of being independent of the cardiovascular (CV) endpoint used, which bypasses the dilemma of whether to use a risk estimation system based on CV mortality or on total CV events. In this study, we evaluated the unmet risk factor goals in a representative Lebanese sample and we calculated the mean CRA of the sample and compared it to the actual mean age. A random sample of Lebanese adults, residing in the Greater Beirut Area, was recruited. Interviews, physical exams, and blood tests were performed. After applying the exclusion criteria for the CRA equation on the sample population, CRA was calculated for the remaining group. A total of 490 participants were enrolled. 199 participants fit the criteria for CRA calculation. Participants of the total study population had a mean age of 45.4±15 years; whereas, the 199 participants had a mean age of 53.3±8.4 years and a mean CRA of 60±11.1 years. More than two thirds of individuals had at least three unmet goals for ideal CV health. These findings contributed to the seven-year difference between the mean CRA and the mean actual age showing that there is room for improvement in community preventive efforts.

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease (CVD); cardiovascular risk age; ESC guidelines


Received: 03 May 2017; Accepted: 28 June 2017; Published: 25 July 2017.

doi: 10.21037/jxym.2017.07.01


Introduction

The recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Prevention Guidelines [2016] have set the goals for ideal cardiovascular (CV) health. Furthermore, these guidelines re-emphasized the utilization of cardiovascular health SCORE to calculate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and guide management (1). One major drawback to the SCORE system is that it needs to be adjusted in a certain population before it can be used. The ESC Guidelines highlighted that cardiovascular risk age (CRA), on the other hand, can be used in any population regardless of baseline risk and secular changes in mortality, and therefore avoid the need for recalibration. CRA also has the advantage of being independent of the cardiovascular (CV) endpoint used, which bypasses the dilemma of whether to use a risk estimation system based on CV mortality or on total CV events (1-3). As CVD risk factors are increasing in the Arab world, and very few countries, if any, have recalibrated the SCORE system, CRA utilization appears quite appealing (4,5). In this study, we evaluated the unmet risk factor goals in a representative Lebanese sample and we calculated the mean CRA of the sample and compared it to the actual mean age.


Methods

The data collection for this study took place at the American University of Beirut (AUB). The Institutional Review Board at the American University of Beirut provided approval to conduct the study.

Study population and sampling technique

The sample used in our study was a random sample of Lebanese adults, residing in the GBA and aged above 18 years. Pregnant women, mentally disabled people and patients on dialysis were excluded from the sample. All participants were invited to present to AUB. A detailed data collection form was filled out for each subject, through interviews, physical exams, and blood tests. After applying the exclusion criteria for the CRA equation on the sample population, CRA was calculated for the remaining group (2).

Data was entered into a database using SPSS 22 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P value ≤0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.


Results

Out of the 490 participants who were enrolled in the study, 199 participants fit the criteria for CRA calculation. Participants of the total study population had a mean age of 45.4±15 years; whereas the 199 participants had a mean age of 53.3±8.4 years and a mean CRA of 60±11.1 years. Table 1 shows the demographics and prevalence of various clinical CV risk factors in the sample population. Figure 1A shows the percentage of study population with different numbers of unmet targets. Figure 1B shows the percentage of the study population that had met versus unmet goals for each of the target risk factors.

Table 1

Demographics and CVD risk factor prevalence

Variables N=490 [%]
Gender
   Male 176 [36]
   Female 314 [64]
BMI categorical (kg/m2)
   <30 285 [58]
   ≥30 205 [42]
Smoker
   Never 124 [25]
   Ex 50 [10]
   Current 316 [65]
Family member diagnosed with CAD
   No 305 [62]
   Yes 185 [38]
Diagnosed hypertension
   No 374 [76]
   Yes 116 [24]
Diagnosed diabetes
   No 416 [85]
   Yes 74 [15]
Diagnosed dyslipidemia
   No 373 [76]
   Yes 117 [24]

CVD, cardiovascular disease; CAD, coronary artery disease.

Figure 1 Percentages of unmet target risk factor goals for ideal cardiovascular health. (A) Percentage of unmet target risk factor goals for ideal cardiovascular health; (B) percentage of population with met vs. unmet goals for each of the target CVD risk factors. CVD, cardiovascular disease.

Discussion

More than two thirds of individuals within this representative cohort have at least three unmet goals for ideal CV health. The most unmet targets were physical activity, obesity and smoking. Target cholesterol levels were obtained in nearly half of the cohort. These findings contributed to the seven-year difference between the mean CRA and the mean actual age showing that there is room for improvement in community preventive efforts. Calculating the CRA of individuals would provide them with valid information about their risk for developing CVD using a number that is independent of the CV endpoint used. For this reason we created a digital calculator that calculates CRA and provides individuals with unmet target goals; the digital calculator can be found by following this link (http://www.aub.edu.lb/fm/vmp/Documents/ESC/esc.html) (6). We anticipate that this would help raise public and professional awareness towards diminishing CVD risk factors.


Acknowledgments

Funding: The American University of Beirut-Medical Practice Program (AUB-MPP) funded this project.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jxym.2017.07.01). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J 2016;37:2315-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Cooney MT, Vartiainen E, Laatikainen T, et al. Cardiovascular risk age: concepts and practicalities. Heart 2012;98:941-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Cuende JI, Cuende N, Calaveras-Lagartos J. How to calculate vascular age with the SCORE project scales: a new method of cardiovascular risk evaluation. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2351-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2095-128. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Mokdad AH, Jaber S, Aziz MI, et al. The state of health in the Arab world, 1990-2010: an analysis of the burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. Lancet 2014;383:309-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Isma’eel H, Sakr G. Cardiovascular Risk Age Calculator. 1.0 ed. American University of Beirut, 2016. Available online: www.aub.edu.lb
doi: 10.21037/jxym.2017.07.01
Cite this article as: Isma’eel H, Hakim A, Sakr G, Mailhac A, Nasreddine L, Tamim H. The majority of Lebanese have an unmet goal for ideal cardiovascular health contributing to increasing their cardiovascular risk age. J Xiangya Med 2017;2:60.

Download Citation